美軍屢屢評估

中華民國海軍陸戰隊戰力世界排名第二

僅次於美國陸戰隊

但由於國家處境艱危,對外軍購不易

以我們陸戰隊武器裝備之落伍

國軍陸戰隊戰力遠勝南韓和對岸陸戰隊

回想起來

是以犧牲所有陸戰隊軍士官兵弟兄休假時間,加強操演所換來的

當年我從未見過,有哪位職業軍人長官有放過

'帳面'上擁有的那三十天'慰勞假'

當行政士時,幫營後勤官辦理離婚退眷口手續時

真是百感交集

這麼好脾氣,做人體貼厚道的長官

只因為幾乎都沒時間放假

妻子認為好像在守活寡,堅決求去

這是制度使然,長官又沒做錯什麼,真替後勤官叫屈

職業軍人都如此了

我們這些義務役海陸阿兵哥,就更不用談了

一天二十四小時,全天候備戰待命

一周只放周日一次約十小時左右

未下坡(服役未滿一年半)新兵想放這寶貴十小時假

除了全身外出軍便服從頭到戰鬥靴燙得沒一絲縐紋

戰鬥靴擦的閃亮發光外

最重要的個人步槍,還要保養擦到班長檢查及格才能放假

出去都幾點了

還要提早七點不到收假,接受被操到會吐的八卦陣'收心操'

在高雄想放假回台北

除非能排到專職衛哨(每月能連休五天)外

就是靠周日留守積假

等老兵時,拿一整天積假,換取寶貴的周六晚上夜宿假

才能回台北

除此外,部隊不斷移防,下基地,受訓

當兵時街頭搭訕的那位年輕女孩

就完全不了解假日我能外出找她

是多麼排除萬難,艱困的事呢?

一句:下次吧,今天我的心情想和女同學逛街

大老遠騎車乘興從左營來到屏東鹽埔

極度失望的只見一分鐘不到就被打發回去

http://blog.udn.com/kuda1994/4959630

http://blog.udn.com/kuda1994/4148037

這樣哪有那個美國時間來經營感情呢?

當時連上弟兄學歷以國小肄業畢業為主

國中畢業就算是少數的高級知識份子了

這種操法幾乎搞的大家都沒有女友

但極端想要有女友,卻是所有弟兄共同的卑微心願

剛好小弟新兵時,是部隊編制那年唯一的大專兵

(配屬的支援連,庫兵大專兵不算)

所以也不管小弟會不會

我永遠是拿筆的考試公差

瞎貓碰上死耗子

例如英文演講,國語演講,小弟都僥倖得第一

從此我就變成連上弟兄的寫情書公差

對象是當時軍中最火紅的愛情青紅燈雜誌,後面筆友天地

當兵前,從不知有此號雜誌

第一次奉老兵命(代寫情書總比被吊在單槓場上操體能好吧?)

代寫情書,看此雜誌時

第一印象,憑良心是有點鄙夷

因為看徵筆友的女生文筆,實在不提也罷

但久了,就慚愧自己才是最該被鄙視的人

渴望愛情,是所有人最純真高貴的感情

但幫弟兄寫信過去的結果

發現弟兄們和小弟的遭遇,幾乎都大同小異

約好的時間,女生輕易就會因情緒或小事而臨時取消

女生們完全不知,弟兄們為了這個約會

是要拿多少積假,千拜託萬拜託長官准假

並和重義氣袍澤換衛兵時段,換(喬)來的

所以我當兵時,曾發下毒誓

當兵時,若有福氣緣份交到女友

除非女友求去

否則保證自己一輩子,會好好守護她,絕不變心

若自己變心的話,天打雷劈,絕子絕孫,不得好死

發完誓不久,就被調去接收海軍雄風飛彈大隊

半年歸建後,某天站安全士官時

發現營部收發,帶來一封字跡非常娟秀的信

收信人是連上最要好小我一梯的好友仁

我知道仁的白人女友,已經回到加拿大老家了

專情的仁不可能劈腿

趕緊拿信給仁,請他趕快拆封,看是誰寄來的

仁有點訝異,竟然有人會寄信來部隊給他

一看信

原來是仁政大英文系女同學,因關心仁

打電話到仁家中,問仁母親我們部隊郵政區號

我馬上要求仁介紹那位女生給我認識

有革命感情的換帖好友仁

二話不說,拍胸圃一口答應說,沒問題

於是請仁和他那位女同學

約好某個周日中午

在女生指定的天母海豚灣義大利餐廳碰面

大概退伍前一個月一個週日

帶著無比雀躍,夾雜著少許因為脫離社會近兩年的不安

和好友袍澤仁

及我極力央求拜託仁介紹他的大學女同學

終於在天母海豚灣義大利餐廳碰面了

那天點何種餐我已經全忘光了

這不重要

重要的是仁約來的那兩位女同學似乎把我空氣遺忘了

只熱切的想知道仁的一切近況

我不只難堪,心理還很不好受

體貼的仁也感覺到,一直想要插話題給我

但無效

我只能微笑在旁聽這兩位同屆畢業

卻因女生不用當兵,比自己早兩年出社會女生,聊最新的社會五花十色

印象最深是她們聊出國去印尼自助旅行的經驗

搭的還是當年連聽都未曾聽過的Garuda航空

天啊 ?人家都已經出國去印尼自助旅行

我還停留在救國團南橫健行

唱'自從在台東認識你,生活就更加有意義'時代

不由得自慚形穢

但也暗自下定決心,以後除非出差,否則決不去印尼

回想以來

出社會工作前夕的第一次被介紹對象拒絕,未嘗不是好事

因為激勵自己要加速成長,以跟上社會

另一角度來看

提早成長

讓自己知道兩性之間拒絕,被拒都是常態

但盡可能顧及對方尊嚴,才是做一個人的基本態度



後記 仁是親情友情愛情各項都十分均衡的水瓶座男生

仁是大學時在何嘉仁美語補習班
當時薪高達三百元的美語老師
愛慕仁的一位加拿大白人女同事
向仁表白說:
I want to be your girlfriend
although I know it's impossible
仁聽完大為感動 就接受她這份深情了
從此大量來自冰天雪地楓葉國的英文思念情書
一封又一封寄來左營桃子園
創作者介紹
創作者 陸戰隊475T 的頭像
陸戰隊475T

海軍陸戰隊475Tkuda1994

陸戰隊475T 發表在 痞客邦 留言(19) 人氣()


留言列表 (19)

發表留言
  • bionicle123
  • 當年能夠週六晚上2100離營外宿(回家過夜)是一件讓大家羨慕死的天大恩惠!
    當了三年陸戰隊,不超過5次!! 現在當兵真好命!
  • 學長早
    沒錯
    週六想外宿條件有二
    兵夠老和拿一天積假來換
    前提是換老大
    積價還有被承認

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/10/16 06:15 回覆

  • 雜種
  • 中華民國海軍陸戰隊,可是有分級!
    然依,美國海軍陸戰隊的評鑑,應該只有一支!所以,有沒有搞混呢?
    恩!
    甚麼是國家的海軍陸戰隊?
    端視,現在的國際環境變化,甚麼是國家實力;
    特別是,海軍陸戰隊,應該是要升級成任一模式的機動部署;
    格外是,爭議地區;
    這是不得不面對的危機處理,即使,威脅,可能很複雜;
    雖然,也不可否認,所謂的聯合作戰體系;
    但這不是海軍陸戰隊的部署行動,簡單來說:
    部署規模和重要性在海軍陸戰隊;
    此外,海軍陸戰隊是國家能夠使用的軍事能力來保證國家利益;
    換句話說,它將是一個國家期望來面對危機和威脅;
    然而,甚麼是國家軍事防衛部署呢?
    所以,也將有兩個問題:
    一,甚麼是海軍陸戰隊的防衛部署?
    二,海軍陸戰隊何去何從?
    當然,問題形成基礎,應該是:
    一,海軍陸戰隊應該升級和擁有自己的能力獨立部署的作戰能力,特別是,飛彈防衛系統
    二,海軍陸戰隊擁有必要性的自我保護能力,包括,攻擊;

    在危機和威脅下,海軍陸戰隊,如何追求未來的升級和參與的攻擊和防衛能力;
    這應該是特別的戰略應用;
    另外,如何能夠最佳地整合海軍陸戰隊來提供最有效的防衛能力來面對威脅;
    總之,技術優勢結合機會來提供防衛和攻擊能力,而且,也不相關於海岸防衛隊;

    海軍陸戰隊是國家的軍事實力來保證穩定與和平!
  • 請按
    http://news.gpwb.gov.tw/mags.php?css=5&nid=2158&rtype=1
    前輩也說出小弟心聲
    尤其是飛彈防衛系統
    真的是罩門
    單靠短程榭樹和針刺飛彈真的不夠
    何況飛彈電腦導引偵搜也可能被干擾破壞
    提供一些牽引式三五快砲給陸戰隊應不為過
    立法委員否決美國同意軍售給陸戰隊的重型掃雷運輸機
    國會應該知錯能改撥列預算才對
    希望前輩能常來討論
    謝謝您

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/10/16 06:26 回覆

  • 雜種
  • 近日比較忙碌!忘了巡視樓主的納悶:首先:
    第一是:引用文誌應該是老梗洗腦教材簡單來說座:捧LP,如果丟給 美國穆倫將軍過目???三秒鐘丟入字紙樓!另句話說:沒有未來戰略發展前瞻思維和視域?
    第二是:引用林委員有言中肯!因為恢復不等同增派!當然爾更無關海岸防衛隊!恩!Homeland security!you know what the mean does?

    引用一:美國海軍上將尼米茲有言:我們出的錢,所以,我捫必須思考!
    感想概論:
    平心而論,國家海上武力是保持一類安全的國家海上生命線;
    所以,它能夠預測國家,面對未來的政治,軍事和經濟危機;
    換句話說:國家應該告訴民眾,現在國家做的,不論決定是甚麼?但這是依據來執
    行國家海上行動;
    面對全球當前,所謂,國家海上武力,也將會遭遇許多不同和新挑戰;
    特別是,不穩定和不可預測的威脅和危機,所以,必須共同來進行努力和協調;
    簡單來說,國家海上武力是技術和智慧的努力來實現,擴大,國家海上安全的相
    互操作性,格外是,機會;
    換句話說,國家海上武力才是能夠整合海洋,而不是老掉牙的大航海一詞;
    這必須是同時,操作先進技術和理論,包括,方法來面對挑戰;
    特別是,執行海上聯合作戰,以專業知識和能力來操作,格外是,海軍陸戰隊;
    國家海上武力,能夠滿足需求和整合來加強相互操作性,並透過,專業技術和知
    識來部署戰略前瞻,精確執行成功的關鍵行動在國家海域;
    即使,專業知識需要時間來發展;
    前瞻性和預測性和支持,將是相當重要的國家海上武力成功實施聯合作戰的理
    念,自海面出擊和機動作戰,特別是,海上操演;
    國家海上武力是準確和即時地了解以技術和操作優勢,並透過,演習和聯合作戰
    來打擊敵人,或如:
    一,知道敵人在哪裡?
    二,知道敵人跑去哪裡?
    三,知道跑去那裡的敵人?
    技術支持國家海上武力,格外是,強調,靈活,操作性,協調,處理來保有動態進程,
    這才是不可缺少的國家海上行動;
    當然耳,不相關於民進黨,因為還不是很了解它;但不是罵蔡英文主席!
    國家海上武力有能力在正確時間裡,提供正確的資訊和未來的共同作戰空間影
    像;
    依據當前的挑戰和聯合作戰理念來滿足國家海上武力的挑戰;
    總之,整合海洋來加強國家海上武力基礎的有效和能力的來操作;
    整合海洋,必須啟動!

  • 前輩所言極是
    小弟也認同國軍陸戰隊由於長久位和先進國家交流
    許多戰術和專業真的有點落伍
    但更嚴重是國家整體大戰略為何
    台灣真的需要有一個有制度中立客觀的軍事智庫
    也非常認同您指的整合海洋
    真是當務之急

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/10/23 18:02 回覆

  • 訪客
  • Reference:We are out of money...so we must think. by Admiral Chester W. Nimitz.Cincpacflt, 1942

    Obviously speaking,the National Naval Force is keeping a safer National lifeline at a
    sea,so,it can anticipate that the nation will face crises of political,military and
    economic crises for the future.In other words:Nation is supposed to tell people,for
    now,the nation is going to do,and no matter what the decision is?But,it will be in
    accordance with National ocean action to execute.
    To facing global for now,so-called the National Naval Force will also meet many
    different and new challenges,in particular,an unstable and unpredictable threats and
    crises,so,it must be work together to effort and coordinate.
    Simply speaking,the National Naval Force are technigue and an intelligence of efforts
    that achieve,expand the National security at a sea of the
    interoperability,especially,more opportunities.
    In other words that the National Naval Force is able to integrate Marine,and not a
    word of antediluvian for navigation,this must operating the advanced technology and
    doctrinal,including,patterns to face challenges,in particular,to execute Joint Operation
    from the sea,and use of expertise and capability to operating,especially,carrier battle
    capabilities.
    The National Naval Force can meet demands and integration that enhancing
    interoperability, and through,expertise and technology to deploy the forward strategy
    to executing exact the support essential to successful operations in the nation's
    maritime space.In spite of expertise requires time to develop.
    Proactive and predictive support will be the most important to the National Naval
    Force successfully implementing the concepts of Joint Operational Forward From
    The Sea as well as Objective-Operations.In particular,exercise at a sea.
    The National Naval Force are accurate and timely to understand that use of technique
    and operational advantage,even,thriugh exercise and Joint Operation to fight the
    enemy,followed as:
    1,Knowing where the enemy?
    2,Knowing where the enemy going?
    3,Knowing somewhere the enemy?
    The technique supports the National Naval Force,especially,it will must emphasize
    flexibility,interoperability,coordination,processing to have situational process,and it
    will be essential for national operation at a sea.Of course,it is not related to
    DPP,because it is not understand it,also.
    National Naval Force now has the capability to provide the right information at the
    right time,and future of the common battle space picture to the warfighters.
    For now,it acknloledges that the concepts of the challenges and Joint Operatioons to
    meet the National Naval Force challenges.
    To sum up,an integrated marine-navy to improve the fundation of an effective and
    capable the National Naval Force to operating.
    An integrated marine-navy must start as soon as possible we can.


  • thank you very much
    are you living in us now ?

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/10/23 18:08 回覆

  • 雜種
  • 話說應該是老梗說法,或如楊念祖先生有言:國家生命線一詞;
    然陸戰隊具有攻勢和防衛之兩面刃佈署,特別是,強化國家生命線,為甚麼呢?
    國家生命線都受制於人,說什麼非核呢?這不是軍備競賽,應該是國家存續的關鍵;
    拿這和民進黨討論?有誰敢吭聲呢?Homeland security!

    技術支持陸戰隊升級來面對新型態的挑戰和威脅
    新型態的挑戰和威脅環境,早已經改變國家武力模式;
    自客觀角度來看,未來的戰爭模式是迅速和資訊交換,特別是,動態進程的轉變;
    所以,必須安全和快速地提供準確的資訊來加強關注;
    這是ㄧ種模式來適應未來國家陸戰隊武力的需求;
    所謂國家陸戰隊武力的目標是提供即時和準確的資訊來評估威脅的能力,特別是,
    評估政治,軍事和經濟的弱點和特性;
    另外是,無需過度依賴系統,因為系統是日復一日地發展來滿足國家軍事武力的要求;
    畢竟,它是技術,也是藝術,但不是迷戀;
    換句話說,國家陸戰隊武力需要不同的技術模式思維在一個聯合作戰環境,重點是能夠預測和分析,包括,評估;
    簡單來說,技術思維能夠允許國家武力發揮作用,這是有效的努力關鍵來提供好的聯合作戰,迎接挑戰;
    所以,國家陸戰隊武力是ㄧ個強大的基礎,以提供迅速反應和即時支援;
    這是會影響國家領域,格外是,戰術運用,這是強調支持國家武力的理
    念基礎;
    此外,運用先進技術來說明理論,同時,反映改變,透過他們來加強和保持國家陸戰隊武力的聯合作戰操作性,特別是,預測性;
    所以,先進技術是國家陸戰隊武力的運作經營系統和操作是以基於這經驗下,必需
    建立一套機制來操作和建立相互操作和以能力來劃分;這是國家的理解能力來升級國家陸戰隊武力來保證和保護國家的平衡趨勢來面對現在快速戰爭的變化.
  • 國家生命線
    的確須控制在國軍自己手中
    但事實是以台灣目前的國力
    真的很難
    小弟倒是覺得
    提高台灣糧食自主率
    才是當務之急
    戰備燃油存量標準也要提高

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/10/27 17:41 回覆

  • 雜種
  • 第一:這也是老梗說法:國家戰略能源儲備!以前國民黨鴨霸!但會玩這個!不可否認這是正確的國家戰略之一!也可恭請郝總長說明;
    然而現在呢?處心積慮地罵蔡英文主席!這可不是未來國家戰略發展前瞻和視域?

    第二:國家戰略能源也可先緣引國際戰略學者 費先生和美國參謀本部之解讀:中國之珍珠鏈戰略!其實這無可厚非!單是一天通過麻六甲海峽就有一千七百萬桶原油!恩!包括台灣!也等同一天有多少原油通過巴拿馬運河?換句話說有誰敢動美國的戰略原油管道呢?
    是以關中共什麼事呢?
    不可否認這是國家安全範疇也不關中共!對否?
    前言有提及:到目前就僅楊念祖先生言:國家海上生命線!
    然而這類都蕩然無存!說什麼戰略儲備和非核呢?
    所以李前總統 登輝先生有言中肯!非什麼非!又不是不能解決!

    有點離題!後幫樓主拉回來!

    The national military strategic concepts.
    Because of changes in the global enviornment,but national military strategy has not reduced,especially,the importance has been increasing day after day.
    It cannot denied that it is resolute determination of the national defense that promise national interests and security partnership.
    Even,to provide the key of importance that work together to face era opportunities and crises.
    In particular,national deployment.The national military strategy is a promise of national military capability to face the deterrent,in addition,it aid provides as flexibility,in particular,operating power of national president .
    So,the national military strategy is the most important of components,if none of it,perhaps that there is no stability and help of society,including,history,culture and philosophy,and so on.
    Simply speaking,kissed the nation good bye.
    The national military strategy explains the national activities of development and process,at the same time,to shows that national promise,emphasize and upgrade the national military capabilities to promote the objectuves of democracy and freedom,promise the well-being of people and the stability for nation and society.
    So,they are not related to history,culture and philosophy,and so on.
    Especially,win the future,it is not related to a word of the Chinese nation?Simply speaking,it will be decisively defeated.
    Besides,national military strategy are the national plans and
    concepts,including,deterrence,crisis response,military force control,security
    parternship,also,containing,confidence-building mechanism,sanctions,peace
    enforcement,and so on.So,they are not related to history,culture and philosophy.
    In other words, the national military and security strategy sitll are the prime
    responsibility and consideration,and it will be ready to promise the well-being of
    people and the stability and peace for nation and society.
    The national military strategy is the national capability for the future,in particular,it has been supporting national military power.

    To sum up,perhaps that principles,as followed:
    1,The operation of the National determination.
    2,Clear objectives and decisive power of the National determination.
    3,The integrating and joint to work together of the National determination.
    4,Improved and upgraded war capability of the National determination.
    5,The key of mission that win the peace for the future of the National determination.
  • Thank you seniors to respond to
    That do not stray
    Chinese bent on dominating the word
    It is not always accepted by the United States hostage energy lifeline
    Then take the U.S. oil embargo on the Japanese Imperial Army
    That led to Pearl Harbor
    To bloodbath occupation of Taiwan, the CPC
    He must first consider the energy embargo the United States

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/10/31 18:11 回覆

  • 雜種
  • 想一想,國家戰略能源儲備,特別是,原油?
    Guess what is the National strategic energy reserve,particularly,petroleum.

    首先,就禁運一詞,這應該是起緣自二十世紀,七零年代,大概是1973和1974年間的阿拉伯原油禁運;
    所以,美國國會授權在能源政策的戰略石油儲備和保護法;
    是以,無需胡亂套用;
    同理延伸,李前總統登輝先生曾言:非什麼非,又不識不能解決?
    他老人家有言中肯,所以,非核一詞,是不是選舉下戰術名稱呢?

    附註:
    戰略石油儲備(SPR),保護法(EPCA),雜種大概在三十年前就研讀後已然複製予記憶!如果,還有納悶可行文至 如王高成先生或林郁方委員等人,可能也會有清楚和簡單說明;
    國家戰略石油儲備非比尋常,這也不相關於老掉牙歷史,文化或哲學;
    老掉牙歷史等,已然終結,這是不能譴責日本政府和三億民眾;

    所謂的EPCA授權是動用國家戰略石油儲備,也是總統權力;
    允許使用的戰略石油儲備,短期內解決國家內部原油供應中斷的情況;

    戰略石油儲備(SPR)是國家戰略能力;
    格外是,不鼓勵使用的戰略石油儲備來解決社會問題;
    所以,也不相關於中共擴充國家戰略能源儲備;

    說明:
    本版應該是提升國家海軍陸戰隊,不可否認,長期以來被忽略;
    當然耳,它不相關於海岸防衛隊!
    換句話說:國土安全都沒有?說什麼個人,社會自由主義呢?
  • Strategic Petroleum Reserve, or whether it is food reserves
    It is important
    Especially the former,
    like Frontline Kinmen and Matsu should be underground
    It makes sense

    Very much agree with what you said
    No state
    What it would be no individual freedom

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/11/02 15:26 回覆

  • 雜種
  • 突然想到,有一天林委員有言:鷹式飛彈連進駐海軍陸戰隊?不可否認,這是正確的戰略思維!而且其來有自!換句話說:
    Guess what,Conventional Long-range attack force?
    11022011 posted by 雜種
    Obviously speaking,in according with studying that the United States as example which has deployed conventional Long-range attack force,particularly,its strategic offensive is approximately for more than 50 years.
    It cannot denied that it will provide National Strategic strike capability to face homeland areas,especially,anywhere around the worldwide,no matter what its has naval&air forces.
    So,Conventional Long-range attack force should not be tactic strike force.
    Likewise,Taiwan's Marine is developing the conventional Long-range attack forse that just explains "deterrence".
    Because Taiwan have expressed about the possibility that under attack .
    Long-range attack force will be an good idea of technologies and concepts,in particular,naval&air power,so, it does not need to blaming China.Promising and Protecting National Security.In other words that the United States of discussion is exactly right.

    Conventional Long-range attack force is Marine Force of effort,and provide more detailed of concepts and plans.

  • Enhance the military corps of course a very good long-range attack
    But Taiwan's limited resources
    Unlike the United States Marine Corps and Marine Corps is an independent military services
    Navy and Air Force long-range precision attack requires coordination
    So I think like many equipped with low-altitude missiles and even Vulcan system
    Enhance the Marine Corps air defense weak
    Priority is transitional

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/11/02 15:38 回覆

  • 雜種
  • Obviously speaking,it can imagine that,as followed two of issues:
    1,Tactical ballistic missile defense is necessity of Marin.Particularly,Joint Operation.
    2,So-called the food reserves is one of National strategic reserve,and Petroleum Reserve seems that,focus on the oil facilities and oilfields.

    It cannot denied that it has been a long story.Or as said that:"National defense technologies".
    For some reason,they are not related to history,culture,and philosophy.
    No wonder the KMT has always been condemned by DPP.

  • 1, to be tactical satellite tactical ballistic missile defense cooperation with Taiwan's current view
    Must tell the truth regardless of which party can not do.
    2
    In addition to grain and oil reserves is an important national strategic reserve as outside,
    Taiwan's limited resources should be focused on
    Good fighter machine Baolei Da first important military facilities, stations and other anti-bomb capability

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/11/04 19:16 回覆

  • 雜種:
  • Reference:
    In addition to grain and oil reserves is an important national strategic reserve as outside,
    Taiwan's limited resources should be focused on
    Good fighter machine Baolei Da first important military facilities, stations and other anti-bomb capability .

    Response:
    1,What is the tactical satellite tactical ballistic missile defense?
    2,What is the Good fighter?
    1,戰略攻擊武力提供精確打擊武力,不是雜種的專利說明!因為真的沒那麼大!端視費先生等知名優質學者群都有說明!簡單來說:
    因為,它是一個具有特別能力的攻擊&防衛平台和作戰能力;
    戰略和戰術武力是未來國家的武力架構,也是載具,特別是,面對未來威脅和挑戰的打擊武力,重點是:未來的系統計畫,因為能力;
    端是北極熊和美國玩了五十年!應無可議!重點是今天第二個十年在二十一世紀!
    這不相關於歷史文化和哲學!即使是也僅是基礎課程!所以:"Work together to "
    透過能力來取得技術和知識和加強精確作戰能力來面對威脅和衝突,格外是,爭
    議區域;
    國家武力是創新和未來投資,即使真的很貴;
    但其佈署仍是保證和保護國家安全和國土安全;
    國家戰略攻擊武力,必須持續努力和支持;
    包括,建設先進技術在國家武力架構.當然耳也無需每每就指責中共!或如:

    "無恃其不來,恃吾有以待也﹔無恃其不攻,恃吾有所不可攻也"
    全球公認的戰書!但可愛的總統閣下和唐先生就亂套用!唉!

    2,Obviously speaking,economic condition,environment of out of sort and developing technology,people of geographic character that will change national security environment.
    So,to face the challenge should be new strategic era for the future,at the same time,it is to selectively operate new,specific of strategic action to promote the national interest.
    These are promise and protection.
    Because new era of national military strategy shows the national
    concepts,missions,objectives and capabilities to face the future challenges.
    The national strategic force is not related to history,culture and philosophy,and so on.
    In other words,the national technology superiority for the future.
    So-called that national strategical force is a selective of flexible strategy.
    National strategic force and security strategy are that must from the presidential explicit stating to emphasize the engagement and the enlargement,in particular,use as capability to promise free society and well-being of people,especially,face the growing global environment.

    附註:基本說法!然
    這不是拿來指責民進黨和罵蔡英文主席!恩!那告訴雜種:
    What is the ballistic missile defense?

    另就national strategic reserve,including,energy and food?容雜種想想再來聊聊!?已經頂撞過蔡英文主席一次!因為真的很喜歡她!






  • You are right
    But did not see the counter in Taiwan who compete for large spaces
    With this vision and ability to execute your macro view national security
    Thank you for your response

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/11/10 17:46 回覆

  • 雜種
  • 端視總念茲在茲:Reserve一詞!那簡單來說明!也可以此來看待非核一詞!所以還是李前總統 登輝先生有言中肯!

    國家戰略能源儲備?

    平心而論,可能歸納入國家戰略能源儲備來說明,非核一詞;
    特別是,允許使用國家戰略能源儲備,在一定時程內,解決國家能源供應中斷的狀況評估;
    畢竟,一個嚴重的能源供應中斷的定義,已經被模糊?
    依據,全球歷史經驗證明:嚴重的國家能源供應中斷和能源市場供求會造成,或預期影響,嚴重的價格增加,這是無可否認;
    雖然,不鼓勵運用現有國家戰略能源儲備以解決能源佈署或應該開始和增加國家戰略能源儲備來替代非核一詞;
    所以,端視李前總統 登輝先生有言正確,可能在未來,將增加嚴重的問題和能源價格上揚;
    簡單來說,國家戰略能源儲備是新的起動來取得國家能源佈署的平衡,或如:
    一,購買和發展新興能源;
    二,提供和佈署未來架構;
    三,恢復和交付未來需求;

    因為國家戰略能源儲備是填補,不是對抗,也不是單純的收購和銷售;
    國家戰略能源儲備是補充,以進一步的能源安全的目標,或提供的一種手段,或努力保持較高的成本的國內生產者價格,支持生產服務其目的;
    應該是降低國家負擔;
    即使,有不爽的意見,不可否認,國家戰略能源儲備的目的是建構一個儲備;在供應中斷的情況下,可以運用它;
    然而,在2011年的日本經驗危機緊張和缺乏信心引發憂慮;
    但是,國家戰略能源儲備,也強調協調的重要性來擊敗未來能源價格的穩定目標;
    平心而論,它是一個新的國家政策來作為新的開始;
    可能,在相當程度上,緩和不爽政府當局的國家政策,同時,也能夠預防來自全球影響;
    格外是,升級前景和能源價格上漲和供應問題;
    日本經驗雖然是一個重要的學習模式;
    但國家戰略能源儲備,可能才是最佳部署,最大程度在發揮開放作用;
    總之,建立一個國家戰略能源儲備;
    不可否認,危機產生憂慮,但也是動力;
    所以,應該重新建立一個國家戰略能源儲備,而且,總統可以授權,當面對爭執不休的狀況下和能源價格上升,特別是,區域儲備能力;

    保持積極,如果沒有儲備?

    說明:
    是以無需往巷裡鑽!一如蔡英文主席和民進黨!另說陸戰隊的升級應該或是如馬總統有言:建構小而精的作戰體!中共說:斬首!是不是呢?不可否認論斬首一詞!應該還是蘇聯軍方位列首席!
  • Just do not know Specific content of what President Ma has made​​: building a lean-body combat

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/11/10 17:50 回覆

  • 雜種
  • 平心而論,飛彈防衛系統應該是一類老梗辯論;不過,這不相關於歷史,文化和哲學僅是國家技術優勢下的軍事能力優勢;

    換句話說:區域飛彈防衛系統

    11072011 posted by 雜種

    所謂國家飛彈防衛系統是一類老梗辯論,但是不跳脫一類範疇,簡單來說,或如:
    基本上,國家飛彈防衛系統是彈道飛彈防衛系統和戰區彈道飛彈防衛系統的計畫下的努力繼續,也可以說是燒錢;
    但這是保證和保護未來的國家和國土安全,因為沒有人可能夠預測未來;
    首先,彈道飛彈防衛系統短期改善現有的空中和陸地飛彈防衛系統,例如:鋪路爪聯合戰術地面系統,鷹式防空系統和搭配愛國者加強飛彈防衛系統,進而,升級國家的軍事能力,包括,短射程的戰術彈道飛彈防衛;
    所以,國家海軍陸戰隊應不應該納入飛彈防衛系統部署呢?
    第二是配置核心戰區飛彈防衛作戰綱領,根據經驗研讀來說,以愛國者加強飛彈防衛系統,海軍區域作戰,管理,指揮,控制和情報,防衛系統,和戰區高空區域防衛系統.

    又所以軍方應不應該讓民進黨修理呢?為什麼?
    附註:雜種總是不記得蔡英文主席和民進黨的英文名稱對不起!

    第三是發展先進的戰區飛彈防禦系統的軍事能力,雖然,很困難,但必需要去作

    說明中,國家海軍陸戰隊應該擁有戰術彈道飛彈防衛和攻擊能力!

    雖然,民進黨也不甚了解,因為,老掉牙歴屎,文化,哲學,基因,說太多了!
    但可以對話!換句話說,國家安全夥伴關係;
    恩!National security partnership

    Obviously speaking,so-called missile defenses should be a very old disputation,but, do not know whose you are,so,simply put,they are not related to history,culture,and philosophy,which are only military capabilities superiority under the National technologies superiority.

    Regional Missile Defense
    So-call the National Missile Defense(NMD) was a very old disputation,but,without think outside of a category.Simply put,as followed:
    Basically,the National Missile Defense(NMD) are under the sequential efforts of Ballistic Missile Defense Organization and Theater Missile Defense,also,it called :"Burning the money".But,it will promise and protect National Security and Homeland Security of the future.Because no one can anticipate future.For example,such as:"911".
    At first,Ballistic Missile Defense Organization short-term improvements to the subsisting air and missile defense systems.Such as:claw shield / Joint Tactical Ground System,Hawk air defense system,and collocate with Patriot guidance enhanced missiles,and than,in order to improve National Military Capability,including,shorter range tactical ballistic missile defense.
    So,should National Marine brings into Missile Defense System of deployment,or not?
    Second,set up of core TMD operational guiding principles,and according study experience has shown that,they will operate as PATRIOT Advanced Capability,Navy Area Defense,including,Battle Management / Command, Control & Intelligence.and Theater High Altitude Area Defense.

    Also said:"Should military is condemned by 民進黨?Why?

    Reference:I own you an apology,hybrid has always not remembered the English names of Chairwoman 蔡英文 and 民進黨.

    Third,is the development of advanced TMD military capabilities,although,it has been more tough,but,it has to do so.

    In statement,National Marine should have tactical ballistic missile defense and attack capability.


  • I think that considering Taiwan's current national defense and armed services forces the configuration of resources
    Marine Corps low altitude air defense capability as long as you can with the field
    If the Army is willing to move aside the best Hawk missile

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/11/10 17:55 回覆

  • 雜種
  • 引述:
    I think that considering Taiwan's current national defense and armed services forces the configuration of resources
    Marine Corps low altitude air defense capability as long as you can with the field,If the Army is willing to move aside the best Hawk missile.
    說明:
    您應該還是年輕人或學生吧!不過瞄和ㄒㄧㄠˊ幾天的台灣軍事"解說者"的文誌太多!不過也不怪您!其實也很簡單!
    What is the National military strategy,particularly,deployment?
    但雜種本布衣布衣論military deployment,等會國防部又不爽?所以先交給蔡英文主席來修理!
    換句話說:上陣不離姐弟兵!
    當然耳,有範例有真相:
    查楊念祖先生在CSIS的談話?才是笑話!足見國防部沒救了!本來對其提出"海上生命線"一詞!還頗有同感!但是呢!現捧LP過頭!而置國土安全於無物!所以,還能論述甚麼呢?

    最後是稐國防,外交沒半套平白,糟蹋中共自建政六十年以來第一個不平條約:ECFA,終日敘述歷史,文化和哲學,或四書五經換易經,大概下回換二十八經?
    不然就照抄GDP鳥理論!
    是以國家還有未來嗎?民眾何去何從呢?更何言軍事力量?
    該不該挨罵呢?

    想一想:台灣北控巴士海峽!新加坡地控麻六甲海峽!端視日本哈死了!居然還有人類不珍惜!所以還說什麼三不原則呢?


  • 您說的
    的確很對
    當年日本皇軍在二戰時
    就是以台灣機場當前進大陸和東南亞的轉場整補基地
    美國人很健忘
    健忘代價是美國單一霸權的終結為期不遠

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/11/13 14:52 回覆

  • 雜種
  • 引述:
    building a lean-body combat,issued by Mr.President.
    說明:
    依據中華民國憲法有言:國家元首具有神聖不可侵犯的地位?所以日後再說史上好玩的說法!雜種也尊重中國國家主席 胡先生!為甚麼呢?
    謝謝

  • 我是認為軍人和公務員
    須謹守國家元首具有神聖不可侵犯地位
    尤其前者是因總統是三軍統帥
    其他公民可享完全自遊批評現任總統
    但不管總統是哪個政黨
    批評時須同一標準
    且注重基本禮儀

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/11/13 14:57 回覆

  • 雜種
  • What is the National security?

    不可否認,國家安全技術和歷史,哲學等沒有關係;但確是至關重要;
    簡單來看,甚麼是國家生存?

    所謂的國家安全技術目的在保持足夠的國家防衛技術;
    特別是,國防工業能力;
    即使,可能遭遇一些困難的戰略問題,但是呢,它能夠迅速地反應來面對全球的
    軍事,經濟和政治改變;
    甚麼是國家安全目標?
    定義上,大概是建立人才和組織的技術整合,包括,開發,製造等的裝備生產能力
    等等;
    或可能實現來保護國家安全和民眾幸福的國家目標;
    另外是,它不是軍備競賽和軍事威脅;
    簡單來說,僅是提供機會來轉換和分配國家技術在國家安全領域;
    格外是,降低資源運用,同時,強調保有基本戰略定義來支持不同的國家安全目
    標;
    換句話說,升級一個快速反應能力來面對未來危機;
    這是國家的技術優勢,少了它,可能會嚴重地威脅到國家安全;
    特別是,海上生命線;
    所以,非核家園是美麗的代名詞,但是呢,能源購買的運輸管道在哪裡呢?
    換句話說,國家安全技術是領導未來的國家戰略和軍事作戰計畫;
    包括,發展一類長期性的國防工業和科技能力和具有戰略定義的國家安全目標;
    這是未來的國家關鍵戰略任務:
    一,承認國家安全技術的性質和未來模式;
    二,重整國家技術和工業能力來面對時間變化;
    三,重新思考國家安全計畫組織;
    總之,國家安全技術是一類精心的戰略規劃讓國家保有一定模式的國防工業和
    科技能力來支持國家安全目標來面對新的全球挑戰;
    特別是,運用新的視域來實現國家安全目標!
    所以,不關牽制一詞,難怪,中共很賭爛!

    It cannot denied that National security technologies are not related to
    history,philosophy,and so on;especially,they are the most important strategic significance,and simply viewing,what is the National survival?

    So-called that purpose of the national security technology that as its to keep an enough national defense technology,in particular,defense industrial capability;
    despite that it may encounter some of the difficult strategic problems,but,it can be rapidly to response to face global military,economic and political changes.
    What is the objective of the national security?
    In definition,perhaps that the base on the technologcal combination of the people and organizations,including,production capability operated to develop,manufacture,and so on,in which,it may achieve to protect national security and well-being of people for the national objective.Especially,know-how?
    So,what is the definition of the know-how?
    In addition.they are not armament race and military threat;simply speaking,they are only to provide opportunities to accommodation and allocation in the national security areas,especially,to reduce in the resources operation.
    At the same time,they emphasize that base on the strategic definition to supporting different national security objectives.In another words,upgrading a rapid response capability to face future crisis.
    These are the National technology advantage,if there is without it, and might have serious implications fir national security,in particular,lifeline at a sea.
    So,Non-clear family is more beatiful code word,but,where is the transportation pipeline of the energy purchasing?
    In other words,the national security technology is leading the future of the national strategy and the operational military plan.including,the development of a long-term defense industrial and technology strategy capabilities,and have the strategical significance of the national security objectives.
    These are national key of strategic missilns for the future,so should followed as:
    1,Determine that the national security technology of the nature and future patterns.
    2,Rebuilding the national technology and industrial capabilities to face time changes.
    3,Reconsider that overall of the national security plans, organizations
    To sum up,the national security technology is more careful of strategic plan can provide nation to keep a pattern of defense industrial and technology capabilities,and supporting national security objectives to face new global challenges.
    In particular,to operating new strategic vision to achieve the national security objectives.
    So.it is not related to a word of containment.No wonder that China feels out of sort.
  • In addition to this point I agree with other nuclear-free homeland
    I agree with you said

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/11/13 15:02 回覆

  • 雜種
  • 引述:
    In addition to this point I agree with other nuclear-free homeland
    I agree with you said
    說明:
    好像有位部落格主也是有中肯文誌!但忘記是哪一位大哥?換句話說:李前總統 登輝先生是對的!簡單來說:

    The national secure energy of blueprint for the future.
    So-called that the secure energy for the future that is a the comprehensive national energy policy,in particular,how will secure that future.
    The artical has thought over from chairwoman 蔡英文&Ex-president Lee.

    Obviously speaking,if it wants to create a secure energy for the future,this
    should protect that has to change.
    Because it is not historical report or joke,including,philosophy,and so on,even,to advance the comprehensive of national technology.
    Also,as said that a independent action and consider how many Taiwan imported of oil a day?
    So,it must be under the premise that provide the national energy strategic of development plan to guarantee that reduce depended on oil by operating and advance alternative energy and energy efficiency.
    The oil prices is more important affect,no matter what everybody,so,the energy options is not only alternative energy,also including,nuclear power.Because the price of oil will still continue to rise.
    These are still available and embracing a diverse energy portfolio to guarantee that nation and people have more secire and able to operate available energy for the future.

    Establishing a 21st century clean energy economy that depends on the
    improvement of science and technology and reduce dependence on oil,so,it is still keeping the nuclear power,clean coal,natural gas,including,solar and wind power,integrate that the cutting edge of the energy technology.
    Efforts can wim the future.
    The secure energy future of blueprint should explain the comprehensive national energy policy to guarantee that dependence on energy for the future.
    Simply speaking,Using the improvement of science and technology to deploy and develop the national energy supplies.At the same time,expand safe and responsible of the development and production.
    So-called that energy development for the futire is a way of the improvement to strengthening the national economy to win the future.
    This is a funding cutting-edge to produce the future of technologies,meanwhile,leading to hit the market.
    It cannot denied that needs to put words into action and lead by example.

    附註:
    端視蔡英文主席的說明沒有衝撞中央政府!這是一類對話和妥協!也許人才庫不足!或許讓人納悶!所謂:Non-clear family?應該是安全控管!甚至升級技術!
    但有點大離題!就此打住!或期待該位部落格主有新論述?雜種樂而分享!
    總之全球改變!技術帶給全球整合!帶給民眾便利和幸福的未來!
    幸福一詞是蔡英文主席率先提出!雜種可以證明!
  • 雜種
  • 引述:
    我是認為軍人和公務員須謹守國家元首具有神聖不可侵犯地位
    尤其前者是因總統是三軍統帥其他公民可享完全自遊批評現任總統
    但不管總統是哪個政黨批評時須同一標準且注重基本禮儀

    說明:
    布衣雜種也是會不悅現任國家元首或蔡英文主席但是呢要以理來說明!不是以老掉牙的歷史文化或哲學行批判之行為!說藉古諷今都是鬼話!塔利班和伊郎如何給全球幹譙呢?
    玩批判也不是沒玩過!但是呢!一個原則!現在還是覺得台灣豬血糕最有味!
    或如:雜種不以為中國國家主席 胡錦濤先生的說明有何錯誤?但也是大離題!有新版相關文誌也樂而分享!?

  • 浮雲
  • 大哥, 您的 "待續" 讓我很急啊..

    小弟我當兵時也好想有女友啊
    那時軍營附近的超商小妹都很搶手
    小妹越兇我們越愛
    我還試著約過福利社小姐
    真的莒光日看多了哈哈
    現在想想阿兵哥真是精虫衝腦的生物
  • 這麼好命
    福利社有小姐
    莫非前輩是在海軍軍區服役
    至於結局
    真的還沒空寫

    陸戰隊475T 於 2011/12/17 17:26 回覆

  • 雅(廣廣娘)
  • 代寫情書,好厲害啊...我也交過筆友說...以文會友是一個蠻奇妙的經驗
  • 男生只有當兵時最想交筆友 呵

    陸戰隊475T 於 2013/02/05 19:45 回覆